Posted by Billdude (@billdude) on April 23, 2025, 2:55 p.m.
- Lord of the Flies (William Golding, 1954)
Good enough I guess, for kids
- Scoop (Evelyn Waugh, 1938)
It’s pretty good. But oh noes, it’s got racial slurs in it agggghh! Can’t read, can’t read!
- The Heart of the Matter (Graham Greene, 1948)
Grim Grin!!!!
- Nostromo (Joseph Conrad, 1904)
I liked Lord Jim and Heart Of Darkness better.
- A Clockwork Orange (Anthony Burgess, 1962)
Am I correct in remembering that Burgess himself was annoyed that this is all people still read by him (he wrote dozens of books) or am I conflating something he said with something that was posted here? Very good book though
- The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie (Muriel Spark, 1961)
You know, I think I kind of forgot the larger point of this book. I know what it’s basically about but I don’t remember what happened in it at all.
- Animal Farm (George Orwell, 1945)
Only read this once and it wasn’t even in high school but hey, it was good!
- Wide Sargasso Sea (Jean Rhys, 1966)
Inspired the funniest putdown on the Brothers Judd site (sorry to bring them up again.) As a book I didn’t mind it or the concept of it. I probably won’t ever revisit it though.
- Tess of the d’Urbervilles (Thomas Hardy, 1891)
- Lucky Jim (Kingsley Amis, 1954)
Good but I preferred his son’s best book
- The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman (Laurence Sterne, 1759)
A hugely important book but one I didn’t much enjoy reading.
- Midnight’s Children (Salman Rushdie, 1981)
Good stuff!!!!
- Dombey and Son (Charles Dickens, 1848)
Readable but not really one of his best.
- A Room with a View (EM Forster, 1908)
Cecil Vyse!!! Inspired a great Daniel Day Lewis performance
- The Lord of the Rings (JRR Tolkien, 1954)
Only read through this once. Liked it though
- Jude the Obscure (Thomas Hardy, 1895)
Bleak stuff, didn’t read his others, good book though
- Heart of Darkness (Joseph Conrad, 1899)
Haven’t revisited this since high school but it was good
- Howards End (EM Forster, 1910)
I wonder how relevant this book is in 2025 given that it’s about how conservatives and liberals will never understand each other.
- The Waves (Virginia Woolf, 1931)
I thought this was the best of the three books of hers that I read for a Bloomsbury class in 2006. Great format.
- Atonement (Ian McEwan, 2001)
Should’ve read this instead of watching the movie, which was shitty Oscar bait.
- Nineteen Eighty-Four (George Orwell, 1949)
Your favorite!! I agree that Handmaid’s Tale is better written but still I like this book more
- Frankenstein (Mary Shelley, 1818)
Good God no
- David Copperfield (Charles Dickens, 1850)
His best!!!!
- Bleak House (Charles Dickens, 1853)
It’s really good!!!
- Great Expectations (Charles Dickens, 1861)
It’s really good!
- Mrs. Dalloway (Virginia Woolf, 1925)
Read this twice in a row and admired her technique but can’t really remember what happened in the book to save my fucking life
- To the Lighthouse (Virginia Woolf, 1927)
See 3.
Other notes:
-Should probably read #1 at some point, though I didn’t much like reading Silas Marner. That, and letting George Eliot win is perverse DEI. Didn’t Earn It!!!!! :-)
-Putting the two big Jane Austen novels right next to each other reeks of laziness. I haven’t read either though. Remember when she got a big revival in the 1990s? Anyone see anything like that having a snowball’s chance in hell of happening today?
-Have I actually ever missed anything by not reading anything by either Bronte sister?
-How about by not ever reading Ishiguro or Zadie Smith?
-Where the cock fuck is The Power And The Glory? Or Martin Amis’ Money?
-I keep meaning to read more JG Ballard but so far have only ever read Empire Of The Sun (where’s THAT?) and The Crystal World which is pulp shit trash ass.
-Never got around to reading Under The Volcano. But I should
-
Re: Reading books is for the weak, says Andrew Tate -
TonyV
April 23 6:36 PM
-
Re: Re: Reading books is for the weak, says Andrew Tate -
Billdude
April 24 11:04 PM
- Re: Re: Re: Reading books is for the weak, says Andrew Tate - TonyV April 25 1:25 PM
-
Re: Re: Reading books is for the weak, says Andrew Tate -
Billdude
April 24 11:04 PM
-
You really need to read White Teeth -
Mod Lang
April 23 4:33 PM
- Re: You really need to read White Teeth - TonyV April 23 6:39 PM